Discussion about this post

User's avatar
Joseph Bronski's avatar

Your analysis is flawed. You computed the likelihood, not the most probable value. Given your assumptions, the most probable value is 150 +/- 4.2.

Second, when you dismiss values we have no evidence of (a '169' IQ score -- I mean, 69? 13^2? It's a joke) and add in evidence we know with certainty, you get a very different result.

When you consider that the g loading of years worth of writing must be pretty high (it's like a 4 year long test), and the fact that his writing is, say, 1.87 SD intelligence (midwit-tier cleverness), you get a predicted IQ of 136 +/- 1.19. So his IQ is in between 132 and 139 with high certainty.

Expand full comment
1 more comment...

No posts